It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.
Lol! Next can be an update on a famous Substacker writing about writers who write about writing on Substack
This brought me back to derivatives in Business Calculus freshman year
Exponential growth can't hurt you
Meta!
I love it. Proper use of the word.
😂😂 I laughed out loud reading this
Good to know!
Hilarious! Another idea would be the subscriber screenshot showing some absurd # count discrepancy between paid and free. 100k free subscribers and 4 paid, etc.
I’m offended, and I didn’t even subscribe
😂😂😂 While I do frequently thank subscribers for being there, I seldom-to-never discuss my 'sub-count'... so I think I dodged this bullet 😉
These guys over at The Onion are dilettantes. Brava!
Grazie
Hmmmm....so the "Hey look at how many notches I have on my bed post " approach, is just as bad to use with SubStack subs, as it is with a new date.
Ever notice how those "advise givers" are tone deaf in things like this - on the whole?
Lol! Next can be an update on a famous Substacker writing about writers who write about writing on Substack
This brought me back to derivatives in Business Calculus freshman year
Exponential growth can't hurt you
Meta!
I love it. Proper use of the word.
😂😂 I laughed out loud reading this
Good to know!
Hilarious! Another idea would be the subscriber screenshot showing some absurd # count discrepancy between paid and free. 100k free subscribers and 4 paid, etc.
I’m offended, and I didn’t even subscribe
😂😂😂 While I do frequently thank subscribers for being there, I seldom-to-never discuss my 'sub-count'... so I think I dodged this bullet 😉
These guys over at The Onion are dilettantes. Brava!
Grazie
Hmmmm....so the "Hey look at how many notches I have on my bed post " approach, is just as bad to use with SubStack subs, as it is with a new date.
Ever notice how those "advise givers" are tone deaf in things like this - on the whole?