13 Comments
User's avatar
Dave Bigalot's avatar

Lol! Next can be an update on a famous Substacker writing about writers who write about writing on Substack

Expand full comment
Lauria Grant III's avatar

This brought me back to derivatives in Business Calculus freshman year

Expand full comment
⚡Thalia The Comedy Muse⚡'s avatar

Exponential growth can't hurt you

Expand full comment
Ken's avatar

I love it. Proper use of the word.

Expand full comment
John Mistretta's avatar

😂😂 I laughed out loud reading this

Expand full comment
⚡Thalia The Comedy Muse⚡'s avatar

Good to know!

Expand full comment
Jesse C. McEntee's avatar

Hilarious! Another idea would be the subscriber screenshot showing some absurd # count discrepancy between paid and free. 100k free subscribers and 4 paid, etc.

Expand full comment
Silvio Castelletti's avatar

These guys over at The Onion are dilettantes. Brava!

Expand full comment
Grand Mal Twerkin's avatar

I’m offended, and I didn’t even subscribe

Expand full comment
Stone Bryson's avatar

😂😂😂 While I do frequently thank subscribers for being there, I seldom-to-never discuss my 'sub-count'... so I think I dodged this bullet 😉

Expand full comment
Connecting The Dots's avatar

Hmmmm....so the "Hey look at how many notches I have on my bed post " approach, is just as bad to use with SubStack subs, as it is with a new date.

Ever notice how those "advise givers" are tone deaf in things like this - on the whole?

Expand full comment